Human-Approved AI Plans
Agent work arrives as a numbered plan a person reads, annotates and approves before a single command runs.
These images are illustrations of the concept, not screenshots of the actual product.
Overview
Coding agents are most useful when they can act, and most dangerous for the same reason. Human-Approved AI Plans is the VibeControls concept for putting a readable, reviewable artifact between an agent's intent and its effect on real systems. Rather than watching a transcript scroll past and hoping to interrupt in time, a reviewer sees the whole sequence first, comments on the steps that worry them, and holds the only control that starts execution.
The first illustration places plan mode inside the AI workbench. The plan is a numbered checklist for a data migration: snapshot a table, add a nullable column, backfill rows in batches, move a read path behind a feature flag, then drop the legacy column after a bake period. Each step has its own checkbox so a reviewer can work through the plan line by line; in the sample the first three are ticked and the last two are still open. A side rail gathers annotations from named reviewers — in the sample data one asks to hold the backfill until off-peak hours, another asks for a rollback note on a specific step — and a single prominent approve control sits at the foot of the panel. A header strip names the agent the plan would run on and reports the connection and the hooks configured for it.
The second illustration extends the same review pattern from plans a person requested to proposals the platform raises on its own. A queue of cards describes candidate work — recovering a degraded agent, reclaiming idle sandboxes past their lifetime, reconciling drifted catalog entries, triaging unowned findings — each tagged by category and marked as awaiting approval. Selecting a card opens its full step list, a reviewer note, an estimated credit cost and the model that would do the work, alongside approve and deny controls and a plain statement that nothing runs until the plan is approved. A banner across the design marks this proposal engine as a forward-looking idea rather than a settled surface.
Together the two screens describe a governance shape the rest of VibeControls reuses: plans are objects, not chat. They can be read by someone who did not write the request, annotated by more than one person, costed before they run and tied to the audit trail afterward — which is what lets a team give agents more reach without giving up the review step.
What this concept shows
- A numbered plan with a checkbox on every step, so a reviewer can tick through it line by line
- Per-step annotations from named reviewers collected in a side rail beside the plan
- One prominent approve control as the only path from a written plan to execution
- A plan header that names the target agent and reports connection status and configured hooks
- A queue of platform-raised proposals, each tagged by category and marked awaiting approval
- A detail pane with the full step list, a reviewer note, an estimated credit cost and the model that would run it
- Paired approve and deny actions with an explicit note that nothing runs before approval
- A banner that labels the proposal engine as a forward-looking part of the design
How it works
- Open the AI workbench for the agent that would do the work and switch to the plan view.
- Read the numbered plan step by step against what the change actually touches.
- Leave annotations on the steps that need conditions attached — timing windows, rollback notes, extra checks.
- Approve the plan once every step reads correctly; approval is the moment execution is allowed to begin.
- Review the proposals the platform raises separately, each with its category, step list and estimated cost.
- Approve or deny each proposal, with the reviewer note kept alongside the plan it applies to.
Who it's for
- Engineering leads who sign off on risky changes
- Platform and DevOps engineers running agents against shared systems
- Backend engineers working alongside coding agents
- On-call responders triaging degraded infrastructure
- Engineering managers accountable for change control
Illustrations
2 illustrations of this concept. Select one to view it full size.
Plan Mode with a Reviewed Migration Plan
This illustration shows the AI workbench with a plan view selected rather than free-form chat. Above the plan, a status line reports that the agent is connected and that two hooks are configured, with a link to manage them, while an agent selector in the corner names which machine the plan targets. The plan card carries a title for a pipeline migration, an active badge and a provider chip. Below it, five numbered steps read as a checklist — snapshot a table, add a nullable column, backfill rows in batches, swap a read path behind a feature flag, drop a legacy column after a bake period — each with its own checkbox; in the sample the first three are ticked and the rest are open. A side rail titled Annotations holds short reviewer comments with avatars, all sample data, and an approve button anchors the panel.
Proposals Awaiting Review
This illustration envisions the same approval discipline applied to work the platform suggests. A full-width banner states plainly that the proposal engine is a concept on the roadmap. Underneath, a heading reads Proposals awaiting review, and a left column lists candidate items as cards: recovering a degraded agent that missed heartbeats, reclaiming idle sandboxes past their lifetime, reconciling drifted catalog components, and triaging findings with no owner. Each card carries a category chip and an awaiting-approval badge. The right pane expands the selected proposal into a four-step remediation list, a boxed reviewer note about confirming a maintenance window, a line giving an estimated credit cost and the model that would run it, and stacked approve and deny buttons above a reminder that nothing runs until the plan is approved. All names and figures are sample data.
Topics
- AI plan approval
- human in the loop AI
- agent plan mode
- reviewed migration plan
- AI change approval workflow
- agent governance
- plan before execute
- AI ops proposals
- approve or deny agent work
- developer control plane AI review
Related concepts

AI Workbench for Coding Agents
Run Claude Code, Codex, Gemini and other coding agents side by side, with governed actions, full run logs and saved answers.
4 illustrations
Reusable Prompts and Managed Contexts
Turn the instructions and reference material your agents need into named, tagged, shareable objects any session can pull in.
3 illustrations
AI Provider Keys, Autonomy and Credits
Bring your own model keys, decide how far an agent may act without asking, and watch the credit meter in the open.
3 illustrations
Actions and One-Click Ops Decks
Turn commands, scripts and webhooks into reusable actions, then pin them to one-click decks your team and on-call rotation can run.
3 illustrations
Part of an industry solution
This concept appears in a cross-product solution on burdenoff.com — see how it works alongside other Burdenoff products to solve a problem in that industry.